Sourcerer vs Origami, honestly.
Origami is the closest motion to ours: one plain-language prompt, AI agents crawl 50+ live sources, verified leads come back — plus built-in outreach. Sourcerer runs the same prompt-to-list path but stays sourcing-only and leads with cited, scored output. Which fits, field by field, our losses marked.
| Field | Origamiprompt → leads + outreach | Sourcererfocused sourcing | Better fitand when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free $0 (1,000 one-time credits); Starter $29/mo (2,000 cr); Pro $129/mo (9,000 cr); Scale $499/mo (40,000 cr). | Usage-based credits. No monthly plan, you pay only for what you source. | Depends Origami meters credits on every built result; Sourcerer is usage-based credits, no per-result metering. |
| Core motion | One prompt → AI agents crawl 50+ live sources → verified, enriched lead list. | One target → source → enrich → score → review. Fixed tables. | Depends Nearly the same motion. We differ on cited scoring; Origami on source fan-out and outreach. |
| Data providers | 50+ live web sources; indexes claimed at 100M+ companies, 350M+ profiles. | EnrichLayer + Claude only, no API keys. | Origami Leads on breadth and freshness. We trade breadth for no-key simplicity. |
| Email & phone | Verified emails and phones as a core deliverable, validated across many providers; charged only on a match. | Sources and enriches profiles; not an email/phone-verification product. | Origami Wins on direct contact details. We concede. |
| Outreach | Built-in "Send" and an unlimited Sequencer, multi-channel from inside the app. | None. CSV export only, no outbound. | Origami Wins. Sourcerer is sourcing-only by design. |
| Evidence | Enriched rows with firmographics (tech stack, headcount, revenue, location). | Scored list with citations per candidate. | Sourcerer Explainable, cited output — why this lead, with sources. |
| Credit model | Every built result — new leads, verified emails/phones, enrichments — spends credits; chat and exports are free. | Data credits only. No per-lead, per-email or per-phone split to watch. | Sourcerer No per-result metering. Origami's model is granular and pass-through, but must be watched. |
| Team & scale | Up to 40 / 200 / 1,000 workspaces, 10 / 20 / 50 simultaneous runs, unlimited members, SSO/SCIM on Enterprise. | Single focused path; pilot, single-user-friendly. | Origami Wins on multi-workspace team scale. |
| Use-case scope | GTM customer-finding only. | GTM sourcing and sales recruiting — source reps by how they sell. | Sourcerer Also serves sales recruiting, which Origami does not touch. |
Origami is the closest thing to us: one prompt, live-web agents, verified leads, and outreach on top — metered by credits on every built result. Sourcerer runs the same prompt-to-list motion but stays sourcing-only, with two fixed providers and a cited, scored list out. Our plays are per-candidate evidence, no per-result metering, one opinionated path, and a sales-recruiting use case Origami doesn't serve. Data breadth, verified contacts, and outreach go to Origami. Both run on a credit model, the difference is per-result metering, not a monthly sticker, re-verified 2026-06-09.
If a cited, scored list beats a metered lead feed, run a target with us.